<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Browser Watch &#187; SunSpider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.browser-watch.com/tag/sunspider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.browser-watch.com</link>
	<description>Web browser news as it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 06:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IE9 Platform Preview 3 available</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/06/24/ie9-platform-preview-3-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/06/24/ie9-platform-preview-3-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acid3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE9 Developer Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven weeks after their last release, Microsoft have let Internet Explorer 9 Platform Preview 3 out of the bag. The updated preview release includes support for the HTML5 video tag, canvas tag support and embedded fonts using the WOFF standard. &#8220;The third Platform Preview of Internet Explorer 9, available now, continues the deep work around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven weeks after their <a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/05/06/ie9-platform-preview-2-available/">last release</a>, Microsoft have let Internet Explorer 9 Platform Preview 3 out of the bag.</p>
<p>The updated preview release includes support for the HTML5 video tag, canvas tag support and embedded fonts using the WOFF standard.</p>
<p>&#8220;The <a href="http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/">third Platform Preview</a> of Internet Explorer 9, available now, continues the deep work around  hardware acceleration to enable the same standards-based markup to run  faster. This is the latest instalment of the rhythm we started in  March, delivering platform preview releases approximately every eight  weeks and <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/04/26/feedback-on-the-ie9-platform-preview.aspx">listening  to developers</a>. You’ll see more performance, same markup, and  hardware accelerated HTML5&#8243; <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/06/23/html5-native-third-ie9-platform-preview-available-for-developers.aspx" target="_blank">wrote</a> Dean Hachamovitch<br />
General Manager, Internet Explorer.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Dean_PPB3_1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1204" title="IE9 Platform Preview 3 Benchmark Results" src="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Dean_PPB3_1.png" alt="" width="589" height="416" /></a></p>
<p>This latest release performs well in benchmarks, now scoring 83/100 in the Acid3 test, up from 68/100 in the last platform preview. SunSpider testing shows the browser is almost on par with the recently released Safari 5, which our own testing confirmed.</p>
<p>Willing testers can check out the IE9 Platform Preview release from the <a href="http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/" target="_blank">Test Drive IE website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/06/24/ie9-platform-preview-3-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE9 Platform Preview 2 available</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/05/06/ie9-platform-preview-2-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/05/06/ie9-platform-preview-2-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 05:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has made available a second release of its Internet Explorer 9 platform preview, with early results showcasing many improvements in the browser over the first platform preview that was released in March 2010. &#8220;Today’s release builds on the first Platform Preview, delivering improvements to IE9’s performance, support for standards, and hardware acceleration of HTML5.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has made available a second release of its Internet Explorer 9 platform preview, with early results showcasing many improvements in the browser over the <a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/03/17/internet-explorer-9-developer-preview-released/" target="_blank">first platform preview</a> that was released in March 2010.</p>
<p>&#8220;Today’s release builds on the first Platform Preview, delivering improvements to IE9’s performance, support for standards, and hardware acceleration of HTML5.  We’ve also updated the <a href="http://www.ietestdrive.com/">test drive site</a> with a new set of developer samples to show what developers can do with GPU-powered HTML5. As part of our commitment to enabling developers to use the Same Markup – the same HTML, CSS, and script – on the web, we have contributed many new tests to the W3C for HTML5, as well as CSS3 Media Queries and DOM. The Developer Tools in this preview include some new features to make finding and fixing markup issues easier&#8221; <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/05/05/html5-and-same-markup-second-ie9-platform-preview-available-for-developers.aspx" target="_blank">wrote</a> Internet Explorer&#8217;s General Manager Dean Hachamovitch.</p>
<p>Microsoft testing shows the browser is also slightly faster in SunSpider JavaScript benchmark test then the previous preview release, with the browser still being faster than Firefox 3.6 and Firefox.Next builds.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/10.-IE9-Platform-Preview-2-is-competive-with-other-browsers.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1060" title="IE9 Platform Preview #2 Benchmarks" src="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/10.-IE9-Platform-Preview-2-is-competive-with-other-browsers.png" alt="" width="662" height="468" /></a></p>
<p>The release come days after figures show that <a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/05/03/browser-market-share-april-2010/" target="_blank">Internet Explorer&#8217;s market share has dropped below the 60%</a> mark for the first time since late 1998.</p>
<p>Windows users wanting to test Internet Explorer 9 Platform Preview #2 can download the browser from <a href="http://www.ietestdrive.com/" target="_blank">ietestdrive.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2010/05/06/ie9-platform-preview-2-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera 10 Beta 1 benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/06/05/opera-10-beta-1-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/06/05/opera-10-beta-1-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acid3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera 10 Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera 9.64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V8 Benchmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have gone and put Opera 9.64, Opera 10 Alpha, and Opera 10 Beta 1 through the Acid 3 test, V8 Benchmark, and SunSpider Benchmark tools to see how the new browser is stacking up. The results are pleasing, with the browser clearly heading in the correct direction. Graphed results are below. The results for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have gone and put Opera 9.64, Opera 10 Alpha, and Opera 10 Beta 1 through the Acid 3 test, V8 Benchmark, and SunSpider Benchmark tools to see how the new browser is stacking up.</p>
<p>The results are pleasing, with the browser clearly heading in the correct direction. Graphed results are below.</p>
<p><span id="more-462"></span><a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opera-acid-3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-463" title="Opera Acid3 Scores" src="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opera-acid-3.png" alt="Opera Acid3 Scores" width="483" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>The results for the Acid3 test were to be expected, with both Opera 10 Alpha and Beta 1 scoring 100%, better than Opera 9.64&#8242;s 85%. In comparison Internet Explorer 8 only scores 17% in the Acid3 test.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opera-v8-benchmark.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-464" title="Opera V8 Benchmark" src="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opera-v8-benchmark.png" alt="Opera V8 Benchmark" width="483" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>The V8 Benchmarks also look good, with Opera 10 clearly ahead of Opera 9.64. Noticeable, there is not much improvement between the Alpha and Beta 1. This test has a base score of 100, and everything over that is better. Opera 9.64 scored 164, while Opera 10 Alpha scored 192 and Opera 10 Beta 1 scored 193.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opera-sunspider-benchmark.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-465" title="Opera Sunspider Benchmark" src="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/opera-sunspider-benchmark.png" alt="Opera Sunspider Benchmark" width="483" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>The SunSpider benchmak results are also looking good. This time there is a noticable improvement between Opera 10 Alpha and Opera 10 Beta 1, with these browsers scoring 4760ms and 4616ms respectively. Opera 9.64 scored a respectable 5523ms.</p>
<p>Overall it looks like Opera 10 is going to be a great release from Opera, with a hugely improved rendering engine, along with a much much faster JavaScript engine. Congratulations to the Opera Desktop team and I egarly await the final release of the browser.</p>
<p>Opera fans can download Opera 10 Beta 1 from the<a href="http://www.opera.com/browser/next/" target="_blank"> Opera Beta website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/06/05/opera-10-beta-1-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome for Linux faster than Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/03/26/google-chrome-for-linux-faster-than-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/03/26/google-chrome-for-linux-faster-than-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LinuxHaxor has discovered that early-pre-alpha builds of Chromium, which Google Chrome is based off, is 4 times faster than current stable builds of Firefox on Linux. The test was run with the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark tool. While these results are impressive, LinuxHaxor mentions that current Google Chrome Windows builds are still 2 times faster than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/3380101464_04a4c4682c_b.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-301" title="Chromium on Linux" src="http://www.browser-watch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/3380101464_04a4c4682c_b-150x150.jpg" alt="Chromium on Linux" width="150" height="150" /></a><a title="LinuxHaxor" href="http://www.linuxhaxor.net/2009/03/23/chromium-linux-pre-alpha-is-faster-than-firefox/" target="_blank">LinuxHaxor</a> has discovered that early-pre-alpha builds of <a title="Chromium" href="http://code.google.com/chromium/" target="_blank">Chromium</a>, which Google Chrome is based off, is 4 times faster than current stable builds of Firefox on Linux.</p>
<p>The test was run with the <a title="SunSpider" href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html" target="_blank">SunSpider JavaScript</a> benchmark tool.</p>
<p>While these results are impressive, LinuxHaxor mentions that current Google Chrome Windows builds are still 2 times faster than early Chromium builds for Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/03/26/google-chrome-for-linux-faster-than-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome getting faster</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/03/18/google-chrome-getting-faster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/03/18/google-chrome-getting-faster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V8 Benchmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news everyone! Google Chrome is getting faster. The Google Chrome Blog has details of the new beta, which suggest that the next version of Chrome is up to 35% faster. The benchmarks used include Google own V8 benchmark, where the browser was an 25% faster, and the Sunspider benchmark which achieved a result 35% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news everyone! Google Chrome is getting faster. The <a title="Google Chrome Blog" href="http://chrome.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Google Chrome Blog</a> has details of the <a title="Google Chrome Beta" href="http://chrome.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-chrome-has-new-beta_17.html" target="_blank">new beta</a>, which suggest that the next version of Chrome is up to 35% faster.</p>
<p>The benchmarks used include Google own <a title="V8 Benchmark" href="http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/data/benchmarks/v3/run.html" target="_blank">V8 benchmark</a>, where the browser was an 25% faster, and the <span style="font-size: 100%;"><a title="Sunspider Benchmark" href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html" target="_blank">Sunspider benchmark</a> which achieved a result 35% faster than the current stable release.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%;">These improvements should make their way in to the stable release shortly.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2009/03/18/google-chrome-getting-faster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.1 beta vs. Chrome beta</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/27/firefox-31-beta-vs-chrome-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/27/firefox-31-beta-vs-chrome-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox 3.1 Beta 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computerworld has posted an article comparing Firefox&#8217;s 3.1 beta to the latest Chrome beta. Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols put both of these browser through the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark test. Not surprising the results were very stunning with Firefox 3.1 beta taking it out. Of interesting note is that Firefox 3.1 beta is almost 25 times faster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Computerworld" href="http://www.computerworld.com/" target="_blank">Computerworld</a> has posted an article comparing Firefox&#8217;s 3.1 beta to the latest Chrome beta.</p>
<p><a class="blogger_name" href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/sjvn">Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols</a> put both of these browser through the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark test. Not surprising the results were very stunning with Firefox 3.1 beta taking it out.</p>
<p>Of interesting note is that Firefox 3.1 beta is almost 25 times faster when rendering JavaScript compared to Internet Explorer 7.</p>
<p>You can <a title="Firefox 3.1 beta vs Google Chrome beta" href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/web_browser_dragster_races_firefox_3_1_beta_vs_chrome_beta" target="_blank">read the article in full and get all the details</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/27/firefox-31-beta-vs-chrome-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JavaScript benchmark performance</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/09/04/javascript-benchmark-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/09/04/javascript-benchmark-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browser Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dromaeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V8 Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the release of Google Chrome, John Resig has performed JavaScript benchmark tests on a wide variety of browsers on both Windows Vista and XP. These browsers include: Chrome 0.2 Safari 4 Safari 3.1.2 Opera 9.5.2 Firefox 3.1 Firefox 3.0.1 IE7 IE8 Beta 2 Testing, using three benchmarking tools; SunSpider, V8 Benchmark, and Dromaeo, has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the release of Google Chrome, <a title="John Resig" href="http://ejohn.org/about/" target="_blank">John Resig</a> has performed JavaScript benchmark tests on a wide variety of browsers on both Windows Vista and XP. These browsers include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Chrome 0.2</li>
<li>Safari 4</li>
<li>Safari 3.1.2</li>
<li>Opera 9.5.2</li>
<li>Firefox 3.1</li>
<li>Firefox 3.0.1</li>
<li>IE7</li>
<li>IE8 Beta 2</li>
</ul>
<p>Testing, using three benchmarking tools; <a title="WebKits's SunSpider" href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html" target="_blank">SunSpider</a>, <a title="Google's V8 Benchmark" href="http://code.google.com/apis/v8/run.html" target="_blank">V8 Benchmark</a>, and <a href="http://v2.dromaeo.com/">Dromaeo</a>, has produced some interesting results. Results show that Google Chrome is ahead in all but one benchmark test &#8211; very impressive for a browser that is still in its early beta stages. It shows the performance of the new V8 JavaScript engine and the power of the WebKit rendering engine found in both Chrome and Safari.</p>
<p>You can read the full <a title="JavaScript Performance Rundown" href="http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-performance-rundown/" target="_blank">JavaScript Performance Rundown article</a> to see the other (not-so)surprissing results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/09/04/javascript-benchmark-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

