<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Market Share Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/01/google-chrome-market-share-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/01/google-chrome-market-share-report/</link>
	<description>Web browser news as it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/01/google-chrome-market-share-report/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=71#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Firefox is just IE with another name, try to install 5-6  addons on it and it will become IE. 
Chrome is definitely fast but still bugs are there, try using Blogger with Chrome and you will understand.
The only option I am left with is to either use FF without any addon or go for Opera.

I went for Opera.Its fast, has less bugs and features which are very well integrated &amp; better than FF or Chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is just IE with another name, try to install 5-6  addons on it and it will become IE.<br />
Chrome is definitely fast but still bugs are there, try using Blogger with Chrome and you will understand.<br />
The only option I am left with is to either use FF without any addon or go for Opera.</p>
<p>I went for Opera.Its fast, has less bugs and features which are very well integrated &amp; better than FF or Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/01/google-chrome-market-share-report/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=71#comment-757</guid>
		<description>Chrome has had many huge security flaws exposed, and no reason to believe there aren&#039;t more which are just undiscovered / unpublished.  It does run JavaScript much faster, but I&#039;ve never had a problem with JS lagging anything out until I used Google Wave (which is still very buggy and will probably run efficiently in all browsers once it matures).  Chrome also uses more memory, partially due to its architecture.

The bottom line with Chrome is that you get a new browser with less security which takes up more memory and solves a problem which is only a significant problem with another Google product which is still in early Beta testing.  Maybe when they work out all of these issues it&#039;ll be worth a second look.  Until then I&#039;ll enjoy FF 3.5 with all its great extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome has had many huge security flaws exposed, and no reason to believe there aren&#8217;t more which are just undiscovered / unpublished.  It does run JavaScript much faster, but I&#8217;ve never had a problem with JS lagging anything out until I used Google Wave (which is still very buggy and will probably run efficiently in all browsers once it matures).  Chrome also uses more memory, partially due to its architecture.</p>
<p>The bottom line with Chrome is that you get a new browser with less security which takes up more memory and solves a problem which is only a significant problem with another Google product which is still in early Beta testing.  Maybe when they work out all of these issues it&#8217;ll be worth a second look.  Until then I&#8217;ll enjoy FF 3.5 with all its great extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew t</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/01/google-chrome-market-share-report/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=71#comment-308</guid>
		<description>I find it painful to return to Firefox or Internet Explorer after using Chrome, personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it painful to return to Firefox or Internet Explorer after using Chrome, personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark hilliard</title>
		<link>http://www.browser-watch.com/2008/10/01/google-chrome-market-share-report/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>mark hilliard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.browser-watch.com/?p=71#comment-174</guid>
		<description>i use chrome and i love it. i find it to be much faster than FF or IE - further, the functionality is clean and easy to use. overall, its a hit in my book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use chrome and i love it. i find it to be much faster than FF or IE &#8211; further, the functionality is clean and easy to use. overall, its a hit in my book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

